2-02-09 State of New Jersey v. Robbie Thomson
A-2980-06T4
Even if the State elicits improper expert testimony by use
of a hypothetical question that tracks the language of the
statute a defendant has been charged with violating or seeks an
expert opinion that an offense was committed, a reversal of the
defendant's conviction is required only if that testimony was
sufficiently prejudicial to have the capacity to bring about an unjust result.
