State v. John Wessells (064599; A-27-09)
Because the defendant has not yet been tried for the
crimes with which he has been charged, he is entitled
to the benefit of the United States Supreme Court’s
decision in Maryland v. Shatzer, ___ U.S. ___, 130 S.
Ct. 1213, 175 L. Ed. 2d 1045 (2010), and the
statements he made during his second interrogation
must therefore be suppressed. 2-29-12
