O.P. VS. L.G-P.
A-0835-13T4
In Part I of this decision reversing the motion court's
enforcement of certain parts of the divorce property settlement
agreement (PSA), the details of the child support provisions of
the PSA and related motions between the parties is provided.
This history is given not only to resolve this case, but also to
illustrate how untenable constantly-changing child support
payments may become, particularly after the entry of a final
restraining order (FRO). In Part II, an explanation is provided
for why the provisions of the preexisting PSA requiring
mediation and parental communication should not be enforced
after an FRO prohibiting contact between the parties is entered. Sunday, April 19, 2015
O.P. VS. L.G-P. A-0835-13T4
