State v. Julie Kuropchak

State v. Julie Kuropchak (A-41-13; 072718)

          The municipal court’s admission of the Alcotest
          results without the foundational documents required by
          State v. Chun, 194 N.J. 54 (2009) was error.  Further,
          because the DDQ and DDR contained inadmissible
          hearsay, which may have unduly influenced the
          municipal court’s credibility findings, the matter is
          remanded for a new trial.