We construed one section of the bias intimidation statute, which defendant challenged as unconstitutional. We held that a conviction under N.J.S.A. 2C:16-1a(3) requires proof of the
defendant's biased intent in committing the predicate crime; proof of the victim's perception of the crime is insufficient for a conviction. That construction is consistent with the legislative history and necessary to avoid holding the statute unconstitutional.
We also construed the official misconduct statute, N.J.S.A. 2C:30-2a, holding that under the facts of this case defendant could be re-tried for official misconduct based on harassment by conduct but not harassment by communication. 01-30-13
